← Back to Library

On the Regulatory Potential of User Interfaces for AI Agent Governance

Authors: K. J. Kevin Feng, Tae Soo Kim, Rock Yuren Pang, Faria Huq, Tal August, Amy X. Zhang

Published: 2025-11-30

arXiv ID: 2512.00742v1

Added to Library: 2025-12-02 03:01 UTC

📄 Abstract

AI agents that take actions in their environment autonomously over extended time horizons require robust governance interventions to curb their potentially consequential risks. Prior proposals for governing AI agents primarily target system-level safeguards (e.g., prompt injection monitors) or agent infrastructure (e.g., agent IDs). In this work, we explore a complementary approach: regulating user interfaces of AI agents as a way of enforcing transparency and behavioral requirements that then demand changes at the system and/or infrastructure levels. Specifically, we analyze 22 existing agentic systems to identify UI elements that play key roles in human-agent interaction and communication. We then synthesize those elements into six high-level interaction design patterns that hold regulatory potential (e.g., requiring agent memory to be editable). We conclude with policy recommendations based on our analysis. Our work exposes a new surface for regulatory action that supplements previous proposals for practical AI agent governance.

🔍 Key Points

  • Introduction of IntentGuard, a framework for mitigating indirect prompt injection attacks (IPIAs) by leveraging instruction-following intent analysis.
  • The development of an instruction-following intent analyzer (IIA) that utilizes 'thinking intervention' strategies to extract intended instructions from reasoning-enabled large language models (LLMs).
  • Robust evaluation results demonstrating that IntentGuard maintains utility and significantly reduces attack success rates under adaptive prompt injection scenarios, such as reducing success rates from 100% to 8.5%.
  • A flexible framework that supports various IIAs, allowing adaptation and integration with different LLM architectures and defense strategies.
  • Innovative techniques for combining structured reasoning interventions that enhance the defense's robustness and the model's instruction-following capabilities.

💡 Why This Paper Matters

This paper presents a novel approach to addressing a significant security vulnerability in LLM-powered systems—indirect prompt injection attacks. By focusing on the model's intention to follow instructions and creating mechanisms to effectively analyze and mitigate such intentions, IntentGuard represents a substantial contribution to the field of AI security. The results not only highlight the effectiveness of the proposed defense mechanisms but also open avenues for future adaptations and research in protecting AI systems from manipulation and unauthorized directives.

🎯 Why It's Interesting for AI Security Researchers

This paper is highly relevant to AI security researchers as it tackles a pressing issue in the deployment of large language models: their susceptibility to prompt injection attacks. With the increasing integration of LLMs in various applications, understanding and mitigating these security threats is crucial. Researchers in AI security can benefit from the novel methodology of instruction analysis and the framework proposed, which provides a new paradigm for addressing similar vulnerabilities across AI systems.

📚 Read the Full Paper

📄 View on arXiv 📎 Download PDF